PICK YOUR POISON Card Game - The “What Would You Rather Do?” Party Game for All Ages - Family Edition

Product Information

All the players (except the Judge), having been given additional details about the two choices, must now make one. This is done by each player (again, not the Judge) secretly selecting an “A” Choice card or a “B” Choice card, matching the card letter with their Poison card choice on the game board. Optionally, a player can decide to play the Double Down card. Another clear trend we have identified is that issuers are creating more documentary flexibility for themselves, to prevent a default in a stressed scenario,” Rao says. Adds Pete Trombetta, vice president and lodging and cruise analyst at Moody’s, “It’s very likely that ships being sold today are discounted from the value placed on them a year ago.”

The US is the largest issuer of corporate bonds globally, according to S&P Global, followed by Europe, while China leads among emerging markets. Unusual assets have been used to secure bonds more often in the US than Europe thus far during the pandemic, Rao says; meanwhile, Avayou notes, debt-ratio thresholds have been declining toward the standard seen for North American and EMEA bonds.

Having now selected two opposing and not super great outcomes, the players have an opportunity to ask the Judge questions regarding the poisons to be quaffed (figuratively speaking). The questions should be scenario based. For example, a player could ask “if I had infant arms, would I be able to use them as well as I use my own arms?” or “can I have the walrus tusks removed by a dentist?”. The Judge answers these questions however they like, further elaborating the complexity of the choices before the players.

Yes, the idiom can be used when choosing between multiple options, not just two. However, it's typically used when all the options have some negative or undesirable aspect. Not necessarily. While the literal meaning pertains to harmful substances, the idiom is used metaphorically to imply difficult or unfavorable choices. These choices may not be harmful, but they typically involve some level of discomfort or challenge. In a more casual context, it can imply choosing between various alternatives, such as deciding what drink to have at a bar. If there is a split decision, the Judge is awarded one point for each player who did not vote with the majority. Yes, while the idiom is of English origin, it is recognized and used in many other cultures and languages, especially in colloquial or informal conversations.But hungry-for-yield investors have lately veered in the direction of being more accommodating, rather than less.