Joined in 2023 
82 
63 About this deal
Bell, Jared O. (2018). Frozen Justice: Lessons from Bosnia and Herzegovina's Failed Transitional Justice Strategy. Vernon Press. p.40. ISBN 978-1-6227-3204-3. Djilas, Milovan. Land without Justice, [with] introd. and notes by William Jovanovich. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co., 1958. In the 1991 census, 5.54% (242,682) of the inhabitants of Bosnia and Herzegovina declared themselves to be Yugoslav. [23] The Constitution of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina from 1990 ratified a Presidency of seven members. One of the seven was to be elected amongst/by the republic's Yugoslavs, thereby introducing the Yugoslavs next to ethnic Muslims, Serbs and Croats into the Constitutional framework of Bosnia and Herzegovina although on an inferior level. However, because of the Bosnian War that erupted in 1992, this Constitution was short-lived and unrealized. Bataković, Dušan T., ed. (2005). Histoire du peuple serbe[ History of the Serbian People] (in French). Lausanne: L’Age d’Homme. ISBN 9782825119587.
Flag of Yugoslavia | History, Design, Colors | Britannica
Zebić, Enis (6 March 2017). "O jugonostalgiji i lojalnosti svojoj državi"[About yugo-nostalgia and loyalty to one's own country]. Radio Slobodna Evropa (in Serbo-Croatian) . Retrieved 15 July 2023. Yugoslav Agreement on Succession Issues (2001)". Archived from the original on 26 May 2012 . Retrieved 14 June 2012. Conversi, Daniele: German -Bashing and the Breakup of Yugoslavia, The Donald W. Treadgold Papers in Russian, East European and Central Asian Studies, no. 16, March 1998 (University of Washington: HMJ School of International Studies) The Kingdom of Yugoslavia had unitary policies, suppressed autonomy and proclaimed the official ideology to be that Serbs, Croats, Bosniaks, Montenegrins, Macedonians and Slovenes were tribes of one nation of Yugoslavs (see Yugoslavism), to the heavy disagreement and resistance from Croats and other ethnic groups; this was interpreted as gradual Serbianization of Yugoslavia's non-Serb population. The ruling Communist Party of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia was ideologically opposed to ethnic unitarism and royal hegemony, and instead promoted ethnic diversity and social Yugoslavism within the notion of " brotherhood and unity", while organizing the country as a federation. [68] Languages Unresolved issues remained. In particular, Slovenia and Croatia elected governments oriented towards greater autonomy of the republics (under Milan Kučan and Franjo Tuđman, respectively), since it became clear that Serbian domination attempts and increasingly different levels of democratic standards were becoming increasingly incompatible. Serbia and Montenegro elected candidates who favoured Yugoslav unity. [ citation needed]
a b Lalić, Alenka Braček; Prug, Danica, eds. (2021). Hidden Champions in Dynamically Changing Societies: Critical Success Factors for Market Leadership. Springer. p.154. ISBN 978-3-03065-451-1.
Yugoslavs - Wikipedia Yugoslavs - Wikipedia
Stelkens, Ulrich; Andrijauskaitė, Agnė, eds. (2020). Good Administration and the Council of Europe: Law, Principles, and Effectiveness. Oxford University Press. p.689. ISBN 978-0-1988-6153-9. Bougarel, Xavier (2003). "Bosnian Muslims and the Yugoslav Idea". In Djokić, Dejan (ed.). Yugoslavism: Histories of a Failed Idea, 1918-1992. London: C. Hurst & Co. pp.100–114. ISBN 1-85065-663-0. Niebuhr, Robert Edward (2018). The Search for a Cold War Legitimacy: Foreign Policy and Tito's Yugoslavia. BRILL. p.178. ISBN 978-9-0043-5899-7. Ker-Lindsay, James (2012). The Foreign Policy of Counter Secession: Preventing the Recognition of Contested States. Oxford University Press. p.33. ISBN 9780199698394.On 11 November 1945, elections were held with only the Communist-led People's Front appearing on the ballot, securing all 354 seats. On 29 November, while still in exile, King Peter II was deposed by Yugoslavia's Constituent Assembly, and the Federal People's Republic of Yugoslavia was declared. [29] However, he refused to abdicate. Marshal Tito was now in full control, and all opposition elements were eliminated. [30] S. Szayna, Thomas; Zanini, Michele (January 2001). "Chapter Three". The Yugoslav Retrospective Case (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 November 2020 . Retrieved 16 April 2019. As part of the research project " Strategies of Symbolic Nation-building in South Eastern Europe", a study was conducted from 2010 to 2014 on the entire former Yugoslav territory with the exception of Slovenia. Within the study, a poll was conducted on the topic of shared identity. Interviewees were asked whether they ever "felt Yugoslav", with three given options being tantamount to "yes, still do", "no, never did" and "not anymore". In all six examined states, majority of the interviewees expressed that they either never or no longer felt so, ranging from ~70–98%, with Serbia being on the lowest end and Kosovo on the highest. Croatia and Kosovo yielded the most clear-cut results with 95% stating either of aforementioned options and less than 3% stating that they still felt Yugoslav. In Kosovo in particular, over 92% stated that they never felt Yugoslav. In contrast, Montenegro and Serbia were the most split states, with ~28% and ~32% respectively stating that they still felt Yugoslav; the two were the only states where more interviewees stated feeling Yugoslav as opposed to never feeling so. Bosnia and Herzegovina had the highest percentage of interviewees stating that they no longer feel Yugoslav at ~48%, followed closely by Montenegro and Serbia. The following table provides more details: [26] [27] Do you ever feel like a Yugoslav?
Great Deal 
New Comment