TP-Link AX1800 Dual Band Gigabit Wall Plate Wi-Fi 6 Access Point, Power over Ethernet (802.3 af/at), System Requirements Microsoft Windows XP/7/8/10 and Vista, Easily Mount to Wall (EAP615-Wall)

Product Information

Besides the access point, I connected a cable from the router to the switch and also the server device (which has a 2.5GbE port, but it’s irrelevant in our case since the TP-Link EAP615-Wall is a Gigabit AP). Then, I connected three client devices, the first being a WiFi 6 computer (equipped with an Intel AX200 adapter), the second is a WiFi 5 laptop (equipped with an Intel 8265 card) and the third is the good ol’ Pixel 2 XL (also WiFi 5). TP-Link EAP615-Wall vs Other WiFi 6 Access Points – 5GHz (80MHz) – 5 Feet – Upstream. Do NOT turn off the power during the upgrade process, as it may cause permanent damage to the product. MtCmdChannelSwitch: ctrl_chl=44, ctrl_ch2=0, cent_ch=42 DBDCIdx=1, ChBand=1, BW=2, TXStream=2, RXStream=2, scan(0) That being said, connecting the WiFi 6 client device (Intel AX200) to the TP-Link EAP610 (80MHz) showed that it’s possible to go up to 702Mbps upstream and 363Mbps downstream at 5 feet. The throughput had a gentle fall at 15 feet, but it did go down quite a bit after going past the 30 feet limit. Still, at 70 feet (-82dB attenuation), I still got 112Mbps up and 48.7Mbps downstream, which is excellent. TP-Link EAP610 vs EAP615-Wall – Wireless Test – 5GHz -80MHz – WiFi 5 and WiFi 6 client devices – Upstream

Keeping the same system as before, I connected the WiFi 6 client device to the 2.4GHz network and I did see a slight advantage for the TP-LInk EAP615-Wall, and it’s interesting to see that this advantage has remained valid even after testing the performance of the two WiFi 5 client devices. TP-Link EAP610 vs EAP615-Wall – Wireless Test – 2.4GHz -40MHz – WiFi 5 and WiFi 6 client devices – Upstream bssUpdateChannel), ucPrimCh=44, ucCentChSeg0=42, ucCentChSeg1=0, BW=2, ucHetbRU26Disable=0, ucHetbAllDisable=1 Great access point and range for indoor use. The white status LED is not too bright at night and the 3 ports on the bottom are great for connecting additional devices if needed. Easy to mount to a standard single-gang electrical/data box.I have mentioned that the TP-Link EAP610 has gotten a smaller case which is excellent news especially since the heat management is still fairly decent and, no, there were no radical design changes, the case simply shrunk, while retaining the same look. So, we’re dealing with a 9.6 x 9.6 x 2.5 inches access point that has a metallic bottom and a plastic top, all covered by a white matte finish. But, when putting the TP-Link EAP610 and the EAP615-Wall next to each other, the latter is still more compact. TP-Link EAP610 vs EAP615-Wall – Ethernet ports Om gebruik te maken van seamless roaming moet mogelijk de firmware worden bijgewerkt. §Voor Omada Mesh en seamless roaming is het gebruik van een Omada SDN-controller vereist. Raadpleeg de gebruikershandleidingen van Omada SDN-controllers voor configuratiemethoden. bssUpdateBmcMngRate (BSS_INFO_BROADCAST_INFO), CmdBssInfoBmcRate.u2BcTransmit= 8320, CmdBssInfoBmcRate.u2McTransmit = 8320

MtCmdChannelSwitch: ctrl_chl=44, ctrl_ch2=0, cent_ch=44 DBDCIdx=1, ChBand=1, BW=0, TXStream=2, RXStream=2, scan(1) MtCmdChannelSwitch: ctrl_chl=2, ctrl_ch2=0, cent_ch=2 DBDCIdx=0, ChBand=0, BW=0, TXStream=2, RXStream=2, scan(1)

Easy Management with the Omada App

This way, while the WiFi 6 AX200 client device was connected to the 5GHz network (80MHz), I saw an average of 653Mbps upstream and 338Mbps downstream at 5 feet. Even if the attenuation was raised a bit (from -41dB to -46dB), the throughput remained almost the same at 15 feet as well, with a slight drop happening at 30 feet. At 45 feet (-72dB attenuation), I saw an average of 276Mbps upstream and 115Mbps downstream, which is still very good for any type of application. TP-Link EAP615-Wall – Wireless Test – 5GHz -80MHz – WiFi 5 and WiFi 6 client devices – Upstream TP-Link EAP615 – Wall – Signal Strength – 5GHz -80MHz – WiFi 5 and WiFi 6 client devices – Upstream

What's the difference between Master Administrator, Administrator and Viewer account in Omada Controller? 04-20-2023 16248 MtCmdChannelSwitch: ctrl_chl=1, ctrl_ch2=0, cent_ch=3 DBDCIdx=0, ChBand=0, BW=1, TXStream=2, RXStream=2, scan(0)MtCmdSetTxRxPath: ctrl_chl=6, ctrl_ch2=0, cent_ch=6, RxPath=3, BandIdx=0, ChBand=0, BW=0,TXStream=2, RXStream=3, scan(1) After connecting the same AX200 client device to the TP-Link EAP615-Wall, I noticed that, while the throughput wasn’t as good at 5 feet, it did prove far more consistent up to 45 feet. At 70 feet (-87dB),I measured an average of 50.8Mbps upstream and 14.2Mbps downstream. Does that mean that using the Mediatek platform and a less powerful chip is better? It depends on the number of client devices. If you don’t connect that many compatible WiFi 6 devices, then you should see an overall better performance with the TP-Link EAP615-Wall. TP-Link EAP610 vs EAP615 – Wall – Signal Strength – 5GHz -80MHz – WiFi 5 and WiFi 6 client devices – Upstream

MtCmdSetTxRxPath: ctrl_chl=36, ctrl_ch2=0, cent_ch=36, RxPath=3, BandIdx=1, ChBand=1, BW=0,TXStream=2, RXStream=3, scan(1)To test the TP-Link EAP615-Wall, I decided to connect the access point to a PoE switch and, since I am lazy and had the unmanaged switch TRENDnet TPE-LG80 on the desk after I finished writing the analysis on how many Watts does a PoE switch use, I used this switch for following tests. TP-Link EAP615-Wall vs EAP610 vs EAP610-Outdoor – Long-term speed test – 80MHz – Upstream – 5 feet. That’s why you need to be aware that similarly to most other wall plate access points, there is a section with an Ethernet port that protrudes a little bit. This means that the Ethernet cable needs to come from junction box and into the access point, so you have a bit less freedom to where you can install the device than you would with other types of access points. That being said, is it possible to mount the TP-Link EAP615-Wall outdoors? The device has no IP rating and, even if there are no ventilation cut-outs, it was not built for outdoor conditions. Please verify the hardware version of your device for the firmware version. Wrong firmware upgrade may damage your device and void the warranty. ( Normally Vx.0=Vx.6/Vx.8 (eg:V1.0=V1.6/V1.8); Vx.x0=Vx.x6/Vx.x8 (eg:V1.20=V1.26/V1.28) MtCmdSetTxRxPath: ctrl_chl=1, ctrl_ch2=0, cent_ch=3, RxPath=3, BandIdx=0, ChBand=0, BW=1,TXStream=2, RXStream=3, scan(0) WtcSetMaxStaNum: MaxStaNum:129, BssidNum:16, WdsNum:0, MSTANum:0, MaxNumChipRept:0, MinMcastWcid:129