276°
Posted 20 hours ago

1ml Syringe & 14G Blunt Needle (5 Pack) for DIY Mixing (1ml Syringe)

£9.9£99Clearance
ZTS2023's avatar
Shared by
ZTS2023
Joined in 2023
82
63

About this deal

nursing or nurse or nurses or physician or physicians or "health care personnel" or "health personnel" or "health care worker" or "health care workers" or "Clinicians*" or "Dentist*" or "Health‐Personnel" or "Medical Personnel" or "Military‐Medical‐Personnel" or "Nurses*" or "Physician*" or "Psychiatric‐Hospital‐Staff*" or "medical students" or "hospitals" or "occupational exposure" or "occupational exposures").mp. [mp=title, abstract, heading word, table of contents, key concepts] In five studies ( Ablett 1998; Hartley 1996; Rice 1996; Wilson 2008; Wright 1993) one surgeon per operation participated in the study, in three studies there was a surgeon and an assistant ( Meyer 1996; Nordkam 2005; Sullivan 2009), in one study there was a surgeon and two assistants ( Mingoli 1996), and in one study it was unclear how many participated ( Thomas 1995). In some studies the number of participants was partly inferred from the number of gloves used. randomized controlled trial" or "clinical trials" or "clinical trial" or "random allocation" or "double blind". or "single blind" or ((singl* or doubl* or trebl* or tripl*) and (blind* or mask*)) or "latin square" or placebo# or random* or "research design" or "comparative study" or "comparative studies" or "evaluation study" or "evaluation studies" or "follow up study" or "follow up studies" or "prospective study" or "prospective studies" or "cross over study" or "cross over studies" or control* or prospective* or volunteer or (MH "Clinical Trials+") or (MH "Nonrandomized Trials") or (MH "Crossover Design") Outcome: number of glove perforations per total number of operations (also in RevMan analyses) but all surgeons were single gloved. Perforation detection: The gloves were filled with water and perforations were noted as jets of water. Secondary outcome: user satisfaction. The best way to keep a blunt needle sterile is to avoid touching the needle itself. This prevents cross-contamination between your fingers/gloves and the solution you’ll be extracting using the needle. Always grip the needle by the plastic base and never touch the metal tubing. 2. Take Note Of the Syringe Tip

UK. Consultants or registrars performing mass closure of the abdomen: fascial and muscle layers. Number studied: 85 patients. Intervention group n = 46 surgeon‐operations, control group n = 39 surgeon‐operations, 85 pairs of gloves observed. Gloves changed before closure commenced. For studies with multiple study arms that belonged to the same comparison, we intended to divide the number of events and participants equally over the study arms to prevent double counting of study participants in the meta‐analysis, but no such studies were found. Once your item has been returned, we will inspect it and take the necessary action as soon as possible. High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.USA. Surgeons and assistants performing caesarean sections. Closure of all anatomical layers. Number studied: 194 operations. Intervention group n = 204 surgeon‐operations. Control group n = 204 surgeon‐operations. All gloves collected. Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate. Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.

TS=(random* OR control* OR trial OR trials OR "single blind" OR "double blind" OR "triple blind" OR "latin square" OR placebo* OR comparative OR "follow up" OR prospectiv* OR "cross over" OR volunteer*) Search effect*[tw] OR control[tw] OR controls*[tw] OR controla*[tw] OR controle*[tw] OR controli*[tw] OR controll*[tw] OR control'*[tw] OR evaluation*[tw] OR program*[tw] All studies used blunt or tapered needles as the intervention and compared them to sharp or conventional suture needles. UK. 17 surgeons performing standard wound closure after hip arthroplasties, skin closed with staple machine. Number studied: 69 operations. Surgeons were double gloved. We used only holes in outer gloves for the outcome. Intervention group n = 38 surgeon‐operations. Control group n = 31 surgeon‐operations. Outer pair of gloves changed before insertion of prosthetic components and before wound closure. We assumed that the number of glove pairs in experimental group was the same as the number of procedures, and used outer glove perforations as outcome.taper* OR blunt* OR protective) AND Needle* AND ("Randomized Controlled Trial"[pt] OR "Controlled Clinical Trial"[pt] OR "Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic"[mh] OR "Random Allocation"[mh] OR "Double‐Blind Method"[mh] OR "Single‐Blind Method"[mh] OR "Clinical Trial"[pt] OR "Clinical Trials as Topic"[mh] OR "clinical trial"[tw] OR ((singl*[tw] OR doubl*[tw] OR trebl*[tw] OR tripl*[tw]) AND (mask*[tw] OR blind*[tw])) OR "latin square"[tw] OR Placebos[mh] OR placebo*[tw] OR random*[tw] OR "Research Design"[mh:noexp] OR "Comparative Study"[pt] OR "Evaluation Studies as Topic"[mh] OR "Follow‐up Studies"[mh] OR "Prospective Studies"[mh] OR "Cross‐over Studies"[mh] OR control[tw] OR controls*[tw] OR controla*[tw] OR controle*[tw] OR controli*[tw] OR controll*[tw] OR control'*[tw] OR prospectiv*[tw] OR volunteer*[tw]) NOT (Animals[mh] NOT Humans[mh) N=68 references TS=("health care worker" OR "health care workers" OR "health occupations" OR "health personnel" OR physician* OR nurse* OR hospital* OR clinic OR clinics) Four studies focused on the risk during abdominal closure ( Hartley 1996; Meyer 1996; Mingoli 1996; Nordkam 2005), two studies on vaginal repair ( Ablett 1998; Wilson 2008), two studies on caesarean section ( Sullivan 2009; Thomas 1995) and two on hip replacement operations ( Rice 1996; Wright 1993). health care personnel'/exp OR 'health care personnel' OR 'health care worker'/exp OR 'health care worker' OR 'health care workers' OR 'health care facilities and services'/exp OR 'medical profession'/exp OR 'nursing as a profession'/exp OR ('virus transmission'/exp AND 'patient'/exp AND professional) The overall quality of the evidence in the studies was good even though the reporting of the older studies could have been better. Given the technical nature of the intervention and the objective method of ascertaining that the gloves had holes, used in all studies, we believe that there is no reason to assume a high risk of bias. The newer studies that are better reported and thus score better with regard to risk of bias show similar results to the older studies. It was however disturbing to notice that the habit of testing for perforations has changed over time to water tests only, which were originally reported to be less sensitive than the air test and even less so than the combination of the two tests ( Smith 1988; Smith 1990). Everyone who has once repaired a bicycle tyre might know from experience that the air test is very sensitive. Very disturbingly, to support the validity of the water test used most authors referred to an article in which the water test had been described but not validated and stated with great certainty that: "the gloves were tested with a previously validated method". Because all authors tested both study arms with the same test, we don't think that this has influenced the results of this review. A possible effect of detecting fewer perforations could be that the effectiveness of blunt needles has been underestimated.

Asda Great Deal

Free UK shipping. 15 day free returns.
Community Updates
*So you can easily identify outgoing links on our site, we've marked them with an "*" symbol. Links on our site are monetised, but this never affects which deals get posted. Find more info in our FAQs and About Us page.
New Comment