276°
Posted 20 hours ago

Casio Men's G-Shock GW6900-1 Tough Solar Sport Watch

£48.87£97.74Clearance
ZTS2023's avatar
Shared by
ZTS2023
Joined in 2023
82
63

About this deal

There you have it: the 3-watch G-SHOCK Starter Set that will gain you instant admission to the cadre of G-SHOCK-erati. This new Solar Atomic model is based on the original DW6900 model, G-Shock’s best-selling case design. Being able to scroll east and west in world time is great, as is the ability to press B in timekeeping and see your last viewed world time above your time.

or 3 seconds), while the EL backlight of the GWM5610-1 cannot be adjusted and is on the shorter side. Come join the discussion about watch collections, displays, watch winders, accessories, classifieds, and more! Four one-time alarms and one snooze alarm are available on the G-Shock, and the middle eye specifies alarm status.

I don't have a GW5600J (yet) but at the moment, if forced to pick one over the other, I would select the GW-M5600 because of its lower profile and I generally prefer squares to rounds. I just added sharpk's nice video review as a link to the original post and will then put it in the review section.

The same can also be said about the GW6900 case, but since the GWM5610 descends from the original G-Shock, it gets a slight edge in this regard.A simple tilt of the wrist from a parallel position to one angled towards your face will activate it. The differences between the DW5600E-1V versus the DW6900-1V are the same as their “GW” counterparts in regards to the size and display, but the “DW” models are basic G-Shock watches and do not have as many features. Many people also find that the side buttons on the GW6900 are easier to press than the buttons of the GWM5610.

Asda Great Deal

Free UK shipping. 15 day free returns.
Community Updates
*So you can easily identify outgoing links on our site, we've marked them with an "*" symbol. Links on our site are monetised, but this never affects which deals get posted. Find more info in our FAQs and About Us page.
New Comment